The Justice Department will have to do a reckoning on the COVID-19 vaccine due to federal government mandates

The Department of Justice just posted a new job ad: It is looking for eight new attorneys to defend the federal government in vaccine injury cases.

The hiring spree presumably comes in anticipation of a surge in lawsuits for COVID vaccines, as people who were forced by government mandates to get vaccinated and suffered serious side effects as a result try to get compensation from a system that is in jeopardy. his against. .

“The office is currently expanding to address the workload created by an increase in cases filed under the Vaccine Act,” reads the announcement posted by the Justice Department’s Civil Liability Section on the USAJobs website.

The recruiting drive comes on the heels of a little-noticed lawsuit filed in Louisiana last month by six vaccine-injured plaintiffs against the federal government.

The lawsuit aims to overturn the legal immunity that pharmaceutical giants like Pfizer and Moderna enjoy over their COVID shots.

Not that any of the lawyers involved expect Big Pharma to pay, but at least if they win, it should force Congress to reform the inadequate vaccine injury compensation schemes that were instituted nearly 40 years ago as an alternative to suing pharmaceutical companies to cease to exist, but they have not adapted to the times.

Commands and misery

Meanwhile, nearly 13,000 Americans who say the COVID vaccine caused them or their deceased loved ones adverse reactions, such as myocarditis, a life-threatening heart disease, or Guillain-Barré syndrome, a debilitating immune disorder, remain in limbo. after doing what they were told was “the right thing”: heeding government mandates to submit to the coup.

The unaccountable and understaffed government court presiding over the so-called Countermeasure Injury Compensation Program (CICP) for vaccines administered under emergency measures is a “kangaroo court,” the suit filed by the court says. lawyer Aaron Siri, partner at the New York firm Siri. & Glimstad.

“The CICP is similar to a Potemkin village. . . an elaborate façade designed to hide an undesirable reality.

“Claims are lost, ignored, denied, or trapped in years-long purgatory of government bureaucracy. Compensation, if any, is neither timely nor adequate.”

As of October of this year, only six people had been compensated out of more than 12,775 COVID injury claims submitted to CICP since January 31, 2020, when the Trump administration declared a public health emergency.

Those lucky ones reportedly received an average of $2,148 each.

Of the 1,800 decisions made by the CICP, only 72 have been deemed eligible for compensation. Another 1,728 have been denied.

That means 96 per cent of claims are unsuccessful and only 14 per cent of total claims have been adjudicated.

Tragic jab cases

Among the plaintiffs in the Louisiana case is Emma Burkey, who was a healthy 18-year-old Nevada high school student when she received the Johnson & Johnson COVID vaccine in April 2021 and suffered a devastating brain injury.

“Now, after three brain surgeries and thousands of hours of physical therapy, she struggles to walk, write and care for herself,” the lawsuit says.

The victim advocacy group React-19, which has joined the plaintiffs, also represents Ernest Ramirez, a car wash technician in a small South Texas town who lost his only son, Ernest Jr., a healthy 16-year-old athlete who died of a heart attack five days after receiving his first dose of Pfizer in April 2021.

The single father’s tearful testimony at a Congressional hearing in Washington, D.C., in November of that year, was heartbreaking.

“I’ve raised my son since he was a baby,” Ramirez said. “My son and I have never been apart. He was my best friend . . . We got the Pfizer vaccine because I thought it was the right thing to do. It was like playing Russian roulette. My government lied to me. They said it was safe. Now I return to an empty house. . .

“I love my country very much, but I no longer trust my government.”

Ramírez couldn’t even cry in peace. Twitter censored the photo he posted of his son’s casket under the caption: “My goodbye to my baby” and three broken heart emojis, and GoFundMe deleted his account to raise money for the trip to Washington.

Their tragedy was an inconvenient truth for a government hell-bent on forcing Americans to get vaccinated whether they needed it or not.

The landmark Missouri vs. Biden free speech lawsuit reveals the authoritarian lengths authorities took to hide the truth.

Demonized critics

With more than 650 million COVID vaccine doses administered in the U.S., the tragic side effects suffered by Emma Burkey and Ernest Jr. may be rare, but that does not reduce the suffering of the victims and their families.

They were censored on social media at the behest of the federal government and demonized by the media as “anti-vaccines” and conspiracy theorists.

“It’s not a conspiracy,” says attorney Siri, pointing out the folly of labeling his clients “anti-vaccines” when they actually received the vaccine.

“They are economic forces and conflicts run amok with no material monetary interests receding for decades. “Class action and product liability attorneys have been emasculated.”

In other words, when Big Pharma gains immunity from lawsuits, the normal market forces that ensure a product is safe are turned upside down. It is logical that greed can have a say.

Is it any wonder that only 2 percent of Americans have received the latest COVID booster dose, according to figures released last month by HHS, a sign of complete confidence in public health advice?

More concerning is that vaccine hesitancy has spread to life-saving childhood vaccines, with the CDC reporting the highest exemption rate in history.

After pushing so much misinformation about masks, lockdowns and the COVID vaccine, and then imposing Soviet levels of censorship on dissenting voices, the federal government and its pet doctors, like Dr. Anthony Fauci, are entirely to blame for the collapse of public trust. that will haunt us for a generation.

Bad reputation for a good guy with a gun

Forget chivalry. The ungrateful woman who was rescued from a subway robbery last week by an armed good Samaritan wishes she had tried to help her without firing a gun.

“Yeah, I think he’s a hero, but I don’t know, I’d probably consider him a bigger hero if he tried to help me without the gun,” she told The Post. “In my opinion, the weapon is a bit extreme.”

Now cool-headed John Rote, who fired a few warning shots to allow him to escape from career criminal Matthew Roesch, has been arrested and charged with weapons offenses that could land him in prison for more than three years.

And he doesn’t even get the victim’s gratitude to console him.

The one person he should be able to count on to speak in his defense seems pretty happy that he’s rotting in jail.

Thank you so much Mrs. With her cowardly Judas act, she made sure that no knight in shining armor intervenes to rescue the next woman attacked by a thug on the subway.

And life in the city becomes a little more barbaric every day.

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button