Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Opinion

NYC Council must not override Adams’ veto on controversial police stops bill

The City Council is expected to vote Tuesday on overriding the mayor’s veto of the lunatic How Many Stops bill.

It seems Speaker Adrienne Adams is pushing hard to override, claiming it’s vital to protect the council’s prerogatives against the mayor.

The speaker — who’s pushed this idiocy from the start — claims that burying cops under paperwork will somehow serve “the health and safety of our city and its neighborhoods.”

It’s hard to see how: Whether police are investigating a shooting in the South Bronx, looking for a missing autistic child in Bed-Stuy or just getting witness statements as they decide how to handle a disturbed person in Hell’s Kitchen, where’s the value in documenting everyone they speak with — even when the encounter yields no info?

All it does is force the officer to spend time back at the stationhouse, mindlessly recording data on race, gender, age, etc., a huge loss of police productivity at a time when the force is shrinking, morale is sinking and crime and disorder remain far too high.

At least Adams got nine Council members to join him for an “eye-opening” NYPD ride-along in Harlem and the South Bronx on Saturday night.

“It was very eye-opening, and I think that this is something we should incorporate when we’re putting together bills like this,” former Public Safety Committee Chairwoman Kamillah Hanks (D-SI) told The Post.

Hanks, like her other ride-along colleagues Democrats Selvena Brooks-Powers, Oswald Feliz, Eric Dinowitz, Rafael Salamanca and Gale Brewer, voted for the Stops bill last month; the ninth, Francisco Moya, abstained.

“I don’t think it will change my mind,” Brewer said.

And that’s the crux of the problem: Council Democrats are wedded to their wrongheaded beliefs about policing in the Big Apple.

On Monday, three mothers of children killed by violence in New York City begged the council not to overturn the veto.

“As someone who has experienced the trauma of violence against their child in our city, I strongly oppose this legislation that would result in officers wasting time filing reports instead of carrying out their duties looking for the person who has committed an act of violence or broken the law,” wrote Yanely Henriquez, whose 16-year-old daughter, Angellyh Yambo, was killed in the crossfire of two criminals in April 2022.

The Post interviewed residents around the city; they also disagreed with their own council representatives.

The question, then, to councilmembers is: How do you justify this vote to the mother mourning her child? How do you justify it to your own voters?

They can’t. This vote is only fueled by anti-police bigotry — a hatred not shared by their constituents, who overwhelmingly want more of New York’s Finest on the streets of their neighborhoods.

Protect public safety, councilors.

Uphold the veto.

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button