Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Life Style

Woman fumes after Australian restaurant charges $380 for live lobster

A woman who was handed a staggering $944.30 ($584.18 USD) bill at an Australian Chinese restaurant has hit out at the establishment online.

Reanna Ho, from Perth, said the incident occurred at Canton Lane Chinese Restaurant on Friday night, where she dined with a group of eight.

While the party ordered eight dishes in total, it was the “live lobster” that sent the bill soaring.

The costly crustacean priced at an eye-watering $615 ($380 USD).

The incident happened at Canton Lane Chinese Restaurant in Australia. Facebook

Ho had been informed beforehand that the lobster’s price would vary based on its weight and the market price, but when the dish arrived, the specifics remained unclear.

She claims the staff failed to disclose the price per kilogram, or even inform her that the five additional serves of noodles would cost $15 ($9.28 USD) each.

“Though I paid the bill, I couldn’t shake the feeling that something was off,” she wrote in a Facebook post.

A phone call to the restaurant the following day revealed that the lobster weighed 4.5 pounds (2.04kg), and was priced at $120 ($74.25 USD) per pound — a detail Ho says wasn’t made clear at the time of ordering.

“We didn’t assume the lobster would be cheap, but based on common sense, the typical price per pound is usually around $60-$70 ($37-$43 USD),” she said.

“Even during the festive period, it seems unreasonable for the price to skyrocket to $120 ($74.25 USD) per pound.


A hand holding a receipt from a Perth restaurant charging $615 for live lobster
Ho said that there was little communication regarding the price of the lobster. Facebook

“If the lobster truly weighed 4.5 pounds, the head should have been huge and noticeable, but none of us at the table saw it.”

Locals were on her side, saying the restaurant should have been more clear about the cost.

“Who goes ahead and cooks a meal worth upwards of $600 ($370 USD) without letting the diner know beforehand that this is going to be extremely expensive?”

The restaurant’s management responded saying that the price and weight of the lobster had not been communicated properly but defended their actions.

They clarified that the lobster’s head is removed for cooking, and that this has been their method since the restaurant opened.

“We do not see the point of wasting the meat of the head just for display purposes,” the management said.

They also explained that rising market prices due to the festive period and increased exports to China were seeing costs soar.

“We have been running this restaurant for 8 years and have been running it smoothly,” they added, insisting that there was “no deceiving involved.”

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button