Tyreek Hill’s Ex Accuses Him of ‘Erratic’ Behavior With Daughter

NFL star Tyreek Hill was accused of using his 5-month old baby daughter as a tool to control his estranged wife, Keeta Hill, weeks after she slapped him with divorce papers, In Touch can exclusively report.
According to court documents obtained by In Touch, Keeta asked a court for help to deal with Tyreek’s alleged behavior.
Keeta claimed that Tyreek, 23, showed up at their marital home to “pick up some things” on Thursday, May 1.
Keeta claimed Tyreek kept changing the story of where he was going to take their baby.
She said he took the baby out of the home and, while walking to the elevator, told her that he was going to “really piss her off” by taking the baby to Los Angeles for the weekend.
In her filing, Keeta said Tyreek’s comments made “clear that he was not acting out of a desire to see the child, but out of a desire to scare” her.
She said his actions are “coercive in nature to discourage” her from “pursuing her marital rights and the support rights of the child.”
Keeta said Tyreek then texted her saying he changed his mind and would bring the baby back to the home instead of going to Los Angeles. She called her ex’s behavior “impulsive” and “erratic.”
Keeta claimed Tyreek does not know their child’s sleep schedule, food or routines.
“[Tyreek] is unable to place the needs of the child over his own needs,” her motion read. Keeta demanded the court order Tyreek not be allowed to leave Florida with the child without notice or until the court makes a temporary ruling on custody.
She also asked that she be given custody of their daughter with Tyreek having supervised visitation until he “learns to respect boundaries and to place the baby’s needs over his own impulses and desires.”
Tyreek has yet to respond to Keeta’s recent plea for restrictions on where he can travel with his daughter.
Tyreek’s lawyer, Michael Gottlieb, told In Touch, “Mr. Hill denies the allegations in the recently filed pleadings; they are false and disparaging. Allegations such as this should be taken with caution as they strategically lodged to gain advantages in child support and time sharing. We adamantly deny these allegations and look forward to proving them to be false in court.”
Back in April, Keeta filed for divorce from Tyreek days after cops were called to their Florida home.

Tyreek Hill
TMZ reported that the Sunny Isle Police Department received a call from Keeta’s mother, Alesia Vaccaro, who reported Tyreek had thrown a computer to the floor and then picked up the daughter he shares with Keeta.
The report said Keeta told police that she had been arguing with the NFL star. She claimed the argument started when Tyreek was accused of not being “involved enough” with their kid.
Keeta told the police that was the comment that sparked the argument on the day in question. TMZ reported that the argument never turned physical and no arrests were made.
Tyreek’s team, the Miami Dolphins, released a statement about the situation.
“On Monday, we were informed that the police were called to Tyreek Hill’s home, and after conversations with Tyreek and members of his family, the police departed the residence without further incident and the case was closed,” a rep for the team said. “We have since been in communication with Tyreek and the NFL and will have no further comment on the matter.”
A day later, Keeta filed for divorce from Tyreek. The couple wed in November 2023.
The NFL star filed for divorce but then withdrew the petition in early 2024. He blamed a member of his team for the filing and said they had been fired.
The exes welcomed their daughter in late 2024. In her petition, Keeta listed the date of separation as April 7.
She said the marriage was “irretrievably broken” with no hopes for a reconciliation.
She said they only had the one child, and she was not pregnant. Keeta demanded child support and asked that the court consider Tyreek’s financial status and his lifestyle when considering the amount awarded. She also asked for temporary exclusive use of their marital home and spousal support.
A judge has yet to rule.