NFL star Tyreek Hill’s estranged wife, Keeta Hill, accused him of cutting off her access to bank accounts she used amid their ugly divorce war, In Touch can exclusively report.
On April 22, Keeta filed an urgent motion, obtained by In Touch, to compel Tyreek, 31, to “maintain the status quo” by reinstating her access to funds for her own support and for the support of their daughter.
Tyreek and Keeta wed in November 2023. They had a child in November 2024. Keeta filed for divorce last month, one day after cops were called to their home over them arguing. No arrests were made.
TMZ reported Keeta’s mother, Alesia Vaccaro, reported Tyreek had thrown a computer to the floor and then picked up the daughter he shares with Keeta.
In her new filing, Keeta claimed that Tyreek earns a “very substantial income, and the parties lived an affluent lifestyle.”
Keeta Vaccaro and Tyreek Hill
She claimed, “[Tyreek] is extremely controlling with the family finances.”
She said after she filed for divorce, she became aware that Tyreek had “unilaterally removed her from the two Chase debit cards associated with the bank accounts that she used to pay for her own expenses, the household expenses and the child’s expenses.”
Keeta said she does not have any income and has no access to the marital bank accounts.
“[Tyreek] removed [Keeta’s] access to the debit cards to make her feel vulnerable and to make the point that he can do whatever he wants whenever he wants,” her lawyer argued.
Her lawyer added, “[Tyreek’s] behavior in denying [Neeta] access to funds for her own and their child’s support is part of a pattern of coercion and abuse by [Tyreek].”
Keeta said the NFL star has the ability to pay all of her and their child’s expenses “as he has done during the marriage.”
Keeta said she needs financial support from Tyreek. She demanded the court order him to restore her access to the bank accounts.
Keeta Vaccaro and Tyreek Hill
In another motion, seeking custody of the child, Keeta claimed that police showed up to their home on April 17, days after the first time they came out to the home.
Keeta said they came after Tyreek showed up to the property and announced he was taking the baby over her objections.
“When the police arrived, the police told [Keeta] that she had no choice except to let [Tyreek] take the baby, and so she did.”
“[Tyreek] has never taken care of the baby, never bathed her, never changed a diaper, never dressed her and never put her to bed. He has never been alone with the baby,” her lawyer alleged.
“[Tyreek] has no sincere desire to spend time with the baby,” her lawyer added.
“[Tyreek] is unable to place the needs of the child over his own needs, his impulsive, unpredictable behavior and his plan to delete the child’s care to others is not in the best interests of and is harmful to the child.”
Tyreek’s lawyer, Michael Gottlieb, told In Touch, “Mr. Hill denies the allegations in the recently filed pleadings; they are false and disparaging. Allegations such as this should be taken with caution as they strategically lodged to gain advantages in child support and time sharing. We adamantly deny these allegations and look forward to proving them to be false in court.”
As In Touch first reported, Keeta filed a recent motion pleading with the court to order that Tyreek cannot leave Florida with their child. She claimed he threatened to take their kid to Los Angeles for the weekend. A judge has yet to rule.
