Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Business

Trader Joe’s beats lawsuit over ‘heavy metals’ in dark chocolate

A US judge dismissed most of a lawsuit accusing Trader Joe’s of misleading and endangering consumers by failing to disclose that its dark chocolate bars contained harmful levels of “heavy metals” such as lead and cadmium.

In a decision on Wednesday, US District Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro in San Diego said consumers in the proposed class action failed to adequately plead that the grocery chain’s chocolate posed an unreasonable safety hazard or were unfit to eat.

While the lack of a warning on labels can mislead reasonable consumers, “alleging that heavy metals can pose human health risks at some unidentified level does not mean the levels in [Trader Joe’s] products pose a human health risk,” she wrote.

The proposed class action failed to adequately plead that the grocery chain’s chocolate posed an unreasonable safety hazard or were unfit to eat. Getty Images

The judge dismissed five claims brought on behalf of shoppers nationwide, including for violating California consumer protection laws and an implied warranty that the chocolate was safe to eat, but said they can try to amend their complaint.

Claims brought on behalf of Illinois, New York and Washington shoppers under those states’ laws can proceed.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond on Thursday to requests for comment. Trader Joe’s and its lawyers did not immediately respond to similar requests.

Several chocolate sellers were sued by consumers after a Consumer Reports study in December 2022 found potentially harmful levels of lead, cadmium or both in dark chocolate bars, for people who ate more than one ounce of chocolate a day.

The metals can occur naturally in soil. Consumer Reports has said long-term exposure to them can lead to nervous system problems, immune system suppression and kidney damage, with greater danger to pregnant women and young children.


Trader Joe's store
The judge dismissed five claims brought on behalf of shoppers nationwide, including for violating California consumer protection laws and an implied warranty that the chocolate was safe to eat, but said they can try to amend their complaint. REUTERS

Godiva, Hershey, Lindt  and Mars, which makes Dove chocolate, are among other companies that were sued over their dark chocolate.

The Trader Joe’s case combined five lawsuits involving 17 law firms.

It alleged undisclosed levels of lead, cadmium and arsenic, another heavy metal, in eight dark chocolate bars, citing the Consumer Reports study and “independent laboratory” testing.

The case is In re Trader Joe’s Company Dark Chocolate Litigation, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California, No. 23-00061.

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button