Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Local News

South Dakota PUC denies Summit’s CO2 pipeline permit

PIERRE, S.D – On Tuesday, Summit Carbon Solutions got a second chance to convince South Dakota’s Public Utilities Commission that there is a way to make their current application possible.

However, it was the landowners in attendance at Tuesday’s meeting with a literal sigh of relief as the Public Utilites Commission denied Summit’s application to build a carbon pipeline in the state of South Dakota.

Citing physical, mental and financial pain, landowners showed appreciation to the Commission for not letting the permit application drag on indefinitely.

“It puts a lot of us at ease right now because of what happened here today, but we’ll still be on watching, we’ll be on guard because we don’t know what this company will do down the road,” Ed Fischbach, a Spink County landowner and longtime opponent of the pipeline said.

Prior to the decision, Summit’s attorney Brett Koenecke insisted that Summit was the party truly experiencing prejudice in the situation and that an indefinite pause to scheduling would’ve caused no issues.

“It’s not about fairness it’s about the law, but it’s a little difficult for a multi-billion-dollar corporation that hasn’t been so kind to landowners to say they were somehow prejudiced, so I thought that was a little bit rich,” Brian Jorde, an attorney for intervening landowners said.

With Summit in need of all five states to approve the pipeline, landowners are expecting the company to look for other possibilities to make that happen.

Koenecke told the Commission that Summit would not turn House Bill 1052 into a Referred Law and therefore Summit with have to go a different direction with options of litigation or another application still possible

Dakota News Now

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button