Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Stories

Louis Farrakhan’s $4.8B case against ADL ‘lacks any substance’

Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan’s $4.8 billion lawsuit against the Anti-Defamation League — accusing the group of falsely proclaiming him an antisemite — “lacks any substance whatsoever” and should be tossed out of court, the group said.

Farrakhan, 90, who once called Hitler a “great man” and for years has talked of “Satanic” Jews who control the government and Hollywood, sued the ADL in Manhattan Federal Court in October, claiming his venomous reputation is a “false narrative” pushed by the group.

With antisemitism at “historic levels” since the Oct. 7 terrorist attack on Israel by Hamas, it’s “more important than ever for Jewish organizations and individuals — and hopefully all organizations and individuals — to be able to call out antisemitism to counter it, without fear of the legal system being weaponized to silence them,” the ADL said in its legal answer to Farrakhan’s case.

While Farrakhan claimed the ADL knew he was no antisemite when they accused him, he provided no facts to back the allegation, the ADL argued.

Antisemitism has been at “historic levels” since the Oct. 7 Israel attack, according to the ADL. Getty Images

“Merely denying the truth of a statement and alleging that the speaker was aware of its falsehood does not satisfy the [legal] requirements for alleging actual malice,” the ADL said in court papers.

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button