Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Business

Judge blocks rule capping credit card late fees at $8 in win for business groups

A federal judge in Texas on Friday blocked the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s new rule for an $8 cap on credit card late fees, a victory for business and banking groups that said the regulator exceeded its authority.

US District Judge Mark Pittman in Fort Worth issued a preliminary injunction against the rule, which was scheduled to take effect on May 14. The injunction was urged by groups including the US Chamber of Commerce and the American Bankers Association.

Pittman, an appointee of Republican former President Donald Trump, cited a 2022 ruling by the New Orleans-based 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals, which found the CFPB’s funding structure unconstitutional.

A new rule capping late fees on credit cards at $8 was scheduled to take effect Monday. REUTERS

“Consequently, any regulations promulgated under that regime are likely unconstitutional as well,” Pittman wrote. “Thus, Plaintiffs establish a likelihood of success on the merits.”

The US Supreme Court is reviewing the 2022 ruling, and during oral arguments in October appeared wary of upholding it. Pittman remains bound by the ruling because his court is in the 5th Circuit’s jurisdiction.

A CFPB spokesperson said the regulator would keep defending the rule, a key part of the Biden administration’s crackdown on “junk fees.”

“Consumers will shoulder $800 million in late fees every month that the rule is delayed–money that pads the profit margins of the largest credit card issuers,” the spokesperson said in a statement.

A CFPB spokesperson said the regulator would keep defending the rule, a key part of the Biden administration’s crackdown on “junk fees.” REUTERS

Maria Monaghan, counsel to the Chamber of Commerce Litigation Center, in a statement called Pittman’s decision “a major win for responsible consumers who pay their credit card bills on time and businesses that want to provide affordable credit.”

The CFPB adopted the rule to counteract what it called “excessive” fees that credit card issuers charge for late payments.

The rule would block card issuers with more than 1 million open accounts from charging more than $8 for late fees, unless they could prove higher fees are necessary to cover their costs.

President Biden and White House economic adviser Lael Brainard at an event last year discussing junk fees. REUTERS

According to the CFPB, issuers collected more than $14 billion of credit card late fees in 2022, with an average fee of $32.

Business and banking groups sued in March to block the rule. The case had been delayed in a jurisdictional back-and-forth over whether the case should remain in Texas, after Pittman initially transferred it to Washington, DC.

The 5th Circuit ultimately reversed that decision and last week gave Pittman a May 10 deadline on whether to issue an injunction.

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button