Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Tech

Elon Musk, Tesla win dismissal of lawsuit by dogecoin investors

Elon Musk and his electric vehicle company Tesla won the dismissal of a federal lawsuit accusing them of defrauding investors by hyping the cryptocurrency dogecoin and conducting insider trading, causing billions of dollars of losses.

The decision was issued on Thursday night by US District Judge Alvin Hellerstein in Manhattan.

Investors accused the world’s richest person of using Twitter posts, a 2021 appearance on NBC’s “Saturday Night Live” and other publicity stunts to trade profitably at their expense through several dogecoin wallets that he or Tesla controlled.

Elon Musk and Tesla were accused of defrauding investors by hyping the cryptocurrency dogecoin. REUTERS

They also said Musk deliberately drove up dogecoin’s price more than 36,000% over two years and then let it crash, with he and Tesla often timing trades to Musk’s public statements and activities concerning dogecoin.

Investors said this included when Musk sold dogecoin in April 2023 after replacing Twitter’s blue bird logo with the dogecoin Shiba Inu dog logo, causing dogecoin’s price to rise 30%.

Hellerstein, however, said Musk’s tweets that dogecoin was the future currency of Earth, and could be used to buy Teslas or literally flown to the moon by his company SpaceX were “aspirational and puffery, not factual and susceptible to being falsified.”

The judge said that meant no reasonable investor could rely on the tweets to pursue a securities fraud claim. He also said it was “not possible to understand” the investors’ market manipulation and insider trading claims.

Hellerstein dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice, meaning it cannot be brought again.

Investors originally sought $258 billion and had amended their complaint four times in two years.


Elon Musk
Musk won the dismissal of a federal lawsuit that also claimed insider trading. WireImage

Lawyers for the investors did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Musk’s lawyer Alex Spiro said in an emailed statement: “It’s a very good day for dogecoin.”

In seeking a dismissal, Musk’s lawyers said there was nothing wrong his “innocuous and often silly tweets.”

They also said there was no proof Musk owned two wallets for conducting suspicious trading, or that he or Tesla ever sold dogecoin.

On “Saturday Night Live,” Musk called dogecoin a “hustle” while playing a fictitious financial expert on a segment of “Weekend Update.”

Musk bought Twitter in October 2022 and rebranded it X. He is worth $239.3 billion according to Forbes magazine.

The case is Gorog et al v. Musk et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 22-05037.

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button